The Age of Insurance: Are we being discriminated?

The age of an individual has always been an issue when it comes to insurance. Yet, it seems that with the spotlight currently firmly on the industry as it finds itself at the heart of the economic crisis (at the same time striving to assure customers that cover is no less relevant and affordable), a wave of criticism regarding age discrimination by insurers has been seen in the media. So are we being discriminated against by insurance companies?

One of the issues that can be seen to hinder the trustworthiness of these discrimination claims is the fact that they seem to have been borne from the work of comparison websites. Without mentioning any comparison site specifically here (and I endorse the usefulness of such services), reports at moneynews.co.uk state of one site’s research which found “that young drivers pay more for their insurance”. (This is in April 2009 under the headline: Car Insurance Industry Rife with Discrimination.)

The first problem here is that this is nothing new: 17 and 18 year-old drivers have had to pay expensive premiums for car insurance cover for years now, and the shocker is that this is still increasing (as are most policies). I acknowledge, also, that a 17 year-old girl must pay 58 percent more than her 18 year-old friend – and this is alarming.

However, I do think we need to understand two things. The first is the process by which car insurance premiums are calculated for individuals with no or minimal driving background. Other than their peer group, where else can insurance companies look in order to ascertain the risk and its subsequent monetary equivalent? The second thing to remember is when the implied (or sometimes, outright stated) answer to a newsworthy issue is to compare quotes from different companies, possibly via a very hand comparison site, then such “reports” are likely to be biased.

That said, in a separate report at the same site (and with research carried about by the same comparison website), a more unfair and less justifiable trend has emerged in the travel insurance sector.

The report, Travel Insurance Prices ‘Hiked Overnight’, states that a 66 year-old individual will pay an average of 106 percent more for a policy than a 65 year-old – a difference that is far more extreme, and which doesn’t appear to need to depend so much on a general peer risk assessment when an individual medical report and the risk of destination can be taken into account. I suppose the lesson here is to keep an eye on your policies with the same fervour you question your information sources.